Rand Paul: Sell Arms To Those We Trust

Posted by admin on Sunday, November 11, 2018

Rand Paul Money Quote saying After the killing of Jamal Khashoggi by order of Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the U.S. should suspend arms sales to the Saudis. Rand Paul said:
 

 

“We should only sell arms to those we absolutely trust. At this point in time, we can’t trust Saudi Arabia. It’s now time to suspend arms sales.” — Rand Paul

 

 

In this quote, Rand Paul is arguing that the United States should limit its arms sales only to countries that it firmly trusts and has confidence in. He asserts that Saudi Arabia can no longer be trusted at this point. Paul believes it is therefore prudent and necessary for the U.S. to suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia until trust is restored or the geopolitical situation changes.

His interpretation is that continuing to provide weapons to a nation like Saudi Arabia that America has doubts about poses risks, so a temporary halt on such deals is a reasonable policy response under current circumstances according to Paul’s view.

We should only sell arms to those we absolutely trust. At this point in time, we can’t trust Saudi Arabia. It’s now time to suspend arms sales. The Senate will soon act on this. They should also immediately replace their ambassador to the US. Change is coming!

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) December 11, 2018

 

Senator Rand Paul: Only in Washington

Posted by admin on Friday, February 27, 2015

 

Rand Paul Money Quotation argues that prioritizing preventative funding means we aren’t saving money precisely because we are voting to spend it. Rand Paul said:

 

 

“It’s curious that only in Washington can you spend $2 billion and claim that you’re saving money” — Rand Paul

 

 

In this quote, Rand Paul is criticizing the logic often used to justify spending in Washington D.C. His interpretation is that while politicians may argue that a large expenditure of $2 billion will end up “saving money” down the line through associated cost reductions or benefits, in reality spending massive sums always adds to deficits and debt.

Paul seems to be suggesting it is dubious or even nonsensical that increasing budget outlays can genuinely be portrayed as reducing costs, except perhaps in the uniquely skewed perspective and accounting of political decision-making in the nation’s capital.

The overall message is one of skepticism toward arguments that more government spending will paradoxically result in financial savings.