Posts Tagged ‘emoluments’

Richard Painter: Foreign Governments Cash

Posted by admin on Sunday, January 15, 2017

Richard Painter Money Quote saying that donald trump will be in violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution on the day he takes office if he doesn’t divest from his businesses and that his mixing of money with politics put us at risk. Richard Painter said:
 
foreign governments would try to meddle in our elections, meddle in our politics and they did not want any foreign government money coming to anyone holding a position of trust with our government Quote
 

“[Trump] will be in violation of the constitution. The founders knew that foreign governments would try to meddle in our elections, meddle in our politics and they did not want any foreign government money coming to anyone holding a position of trust with our government” — Richard Painter

 

Share </> Quote Image

Share the Richard Painter Money quote image above on your site:

 
Short Link to this Quote:

[collapse]

 

Richard Painter is saying that if President Trump does not fully divest from his business interests, then he will be in violation of the Constitution specifically regarding the Emoluments Clause.

Painter notes that the founders were concerned about foreign governments trying to influence American politics, such as through providing money to elected officials. According to Painter, the Emoluments Clause aims to prevent this type of foreign government influence by prohibiting office holders like the President from receiving money or financial benefits from foreign states.

By claiming Trump will be violating the Constitution, Painter is arguing that the Emoluments Clause requires full divestment from businesses that could potentially provide profits influenced by foreign governments.

Norman Eisen: Trump Hotel Emoluments

Posted by admin on Saturday, January 14, 2017

Norman Eisen Money Quote as former chief White House ethics lawyer for President Obama acknowledging Trump Hotel profits have been resolved emoluments clause concerns based on plan put forward by Trump ethics lawyers – but no other aspect of his businesses are included. Norman Eisen said:
 
The emoluments clause is not written to say that all emoluments are permitted except for Trump hotel profits Quote
 

“The emoluments clause is not written to say that all emoluments are permitted except for Trump hotel profits” — Norman Eisen

 

Share </> Quote Image

Share the Norman Eisen Money quote image above on your site:

 
Short Link to this Quote:

[collapse]

 

Norman Eisen is arguing that the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution should not be interpreted narrowly as only prohibiting profits from Trump’s hotel business.

Eisen believes the clause more broadly prohibits the President from receiving any emoluments, which traditionally have been defined as profits, gains, or advantages of any kind from foreign states.

By saying the clause is “not written” to only ban Trump hotel profits, Eisen is asserting that the President is barred from receiving emoluments through any part of his business empire that could be influenced by foreign governments, not just one hotel.

Richard Painter: Trump Emoluments Clause

Posted by admin on Saturday, January 14, 2017

Richard Painter Money Quote saying Trump legal maneuvers attempting to skirt the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution are entirely inappropriate. Richard Painter said:
 
emoluments, these payments from foreign governments, have to be out of the Trump business empire on Jan. 20 or he will be in violation of the law Quote
 

“The plan we heard today does not comply with the law. And these emoluments, these payments from foreign governments, have to be out of the Trump business empire on Jan. 20 or he will be in violation of the law” — Richard Painter

 

Share </> Quote Image

Share the Richard Painter Money quote image above on your site:

 
Short Link to this Quote:

[collapse]

 

Richard Painter is saying that President Trump’s plan to address conflicts of interest regarding his business empire does not go far enough to comply with the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Painter argues that for Trump to avoid being in violation of the law when he takes office on January 20th, he needs to fully divest from his business interests and remove “emoluments” or payments from foreign governments.

By saying Trump “will be in violation of the law” if he does not divest, Painter is asserting that the Emoluments Clause requires the President not to receive any foreign government payments or profits through his business activities when serving as President.

Money Quotes Daily

Money Quotes Daily